New: How Brevo cut root-cause time to under 5 minutesRead the story →
ewake

Get ahead of incidents.

Your AI on-call engineer owns production issues, from the first page to the fix.

Trusted every day by

BrevoPlanityBooksyBlast

AI on-call for your software system

ewake takes the whole on-call shift: it triages, investigates and fixes. You only get the pages that need you.

    Learn more about alerts
# p1-alerting9
Today

DatadogApp11:02 AM

[Triggered] [PROD] payment-api 5xx rate above 2%

5xx rate is 6.8% on payment-api (threshold 2%). @payments-oncall

Datadog · Monitor 7730415

ewakeApp11:06 AM

Taking the page.

Root cause found · investigated by ewake

payment-api 5xx rate above 2%

Error rate on payment-api rose from 0.3% to 6.8%, and every failure is raised from acquireConnection(). Most likely cause: connection pool exhaustion after #4821 lowered max_size from 32 to 8. The deploy landed 4 minutes before the first error.
Open investigationAsk why

Built for high-scale production environments

5×
faster time to root cause
90%
accuracy
5 min
from alert to fix
Brevo
90%
of investigations named the right cause

“ewake proved extremely useful during production investigations, consistently pointing us to the right root cause and saving precious time, especially during on-call.”

PS

Piyush S.

Lead Software Engineer, Brevo

Connects to your stack, maps your production

ewake plugs into your observability, alerting, code and chat, and builds a live map of your services, deploys and dependencies from them, so every investigation starts from what actually changed.

  • DatadogDatadog
  • GrafanaGrafana
  • PagerDutyPagerDuty
  • NotionNotion
  • JiraJira
  • LinearLinear
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • GitHubGitHub
  • GitLabGitLab
  • Custom MCPCustom MCP
  • Slack
  • incident.io
  • Rootly
  • FireHydrant
  • PrometheusPrometheus
  • OpsGenieOpsGenie
  • ElasticElastic
  • ClickHouseClickHouse

Frequently asked questions

It takes the whole shift. On alerts, it closes the noise and detects the real issues, with the root cause posted in the alert's thread. On incidents, it works toward a scoped fix, or hands over to the on-call with the evidence attached. On deployments, it watches every release for days and flags a drift before any monitor fires.

Only when it needs you: when human judgment is required, when customers are affected, or when the fix is outside what you allowed it to do. The page arrives with the investigation, the evidence, what it ruled out and the recommended action.

No. It takes the first response and the legwork of every alert, so your engineers only step in for the decisions that need them. Your team keeps ownership of production and sets the limits ewake works within.

It shows its work. Every conclusion arrives with a confidence score, the evidence behind it, and what it ruled out along the way. Your engineers can challenge it in the thread and get the reasoning back. This is identical in every deployment.

It acts inside limits you set. You decide what it can do on its own, what needs an approving human, and what it should only ever suggest. Write access is off until you turn it on, per service.

Never. Your telemetry, your code, and your incidents are never used to train or fine-tune any model, in any hosting option, at any tier. There is no exception and no opt-out to manage.

Your existing stack. Observability (Datadog, Grafana, Prometheus and others), alerting (PagerDuty, OpsGenie), code (GitHub, GitLab), tickets (Jira, Linear), and chat (Slack). No new tooling, no custom instrumentation, no code changes. The integration list is the same whichever way you deploy.

On SaaS, minutes. Connect your tools, pick your Slack channel, and ewake starts analysing. BYOC and self-hosted add one infrastructure step, which we run with your platform team. After that first step, day-to-day operation is identical across all three.

Point ewake at your own production

Thirty minutes to connect it, one perimeter, your real alerts. You will know inside a week whether it holds, on your stack, not in a sandbox.